RUDOVSKY et al v. WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION et al

Filing 110

NOTICE OF APPEAL by THOMPSON LEGAL AND REGULATORY INC., WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, WEST SERVICES INC.. Copies to Judge, Clerk USCA, Appeals Clerk and (BORGER, MATTHEW) Modified on 4/20/2011 (nd, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID RUDOVSKY and LEONARD SOSNOV, Plaintiffs, v. WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, WEST SERVICES INC., AND THOMSON LEGAL AND REGULATORY INC. t/a THOMSON WEST, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-727 NOTICE OF APPEAL Notice is hereby given that Defendants West Publishing Corporation, West Services Inc. and Thomson Legal and Regulatory Inc. t/a Thomson West hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from the final judgment entered in this action on the 13th day of April 2011, the superseded judgment that was entered on the 17th day of December 2010 (which was the subject of Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 50/59 Motion), and from all prior interlocutory orders and rulings that produced and are merged into the final judgment, including (for the avoidance of doubt) the denial of Defendants’ Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial, entered on the 30th day of March 2011 and the 13th day of April 2011; and the denial of Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration, entered on the 13th day of April 2011. 1120564_2 Dated: April 19, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ James F. Rittinger James F. Rittinger, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) Aaron M. Zeisler, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice) SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP 230 Park Avenue, 11th Floor New York, NY 10169-0079 Tel: (212) 818-9200 Email: jrittinger@ssbb.com azeisler@ssbb.com /s/ Matthew J. Borger Matthew J. Borger, Esq. KLEHR HARRISON HARVEY BRANZBURG LLP 1835 Market Street, Suite 1400 Philadelphia, PA 19103 Tel: (215) 568-6060 Email: mborger@klehr.com 2 1120564_2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?