ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC et al

Filing 134

ORDER THAT JAMES DUGAN AND ART SADIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL IS DENIED. GSK'S MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. ATTORNEY DUGAN MUST RESPOND TO GSK'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION BY 11/22/2019 AS OUTLINED HEREIN. ATTORNEY SADIN MUST RESPOND TO GSK'S REQUEST FOR ADMISSION BY 11/22/2019 AS OUTLINED HEREIN.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/8/2019. 11/8/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE DOC 5288 IN 07-MD-1871)(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTER"l DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: AV ANDIA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES A~D PRODL'CTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL N0.1871 07-md-1871 FP . . E:D NOV 38 2019 8 KATE 8t.PKi.:Ai\J, Clerk Y. _Dep. Clerk THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: Allied Services Division Welfare Fund v. GSK Civil Action No. 09-730 ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of November 2019, upon consideration of James Dugan and Art Sadin's Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 128] and the response and reply thereto and GSK's Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 130] and the response thereto, and for the reasons stated in the separate Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. James Dugan and Art Sadin's Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 128] is DENIED; 2. GSK's Motion to Compel [Doc. No. 130] is GRANTED in part and DE~IED in part as explained in the Memorandum Opinion. Specifically, Attorney Dugan must respond by November 22, 2019, to GSK's Requests for Admission Nos. 5--14 and 20--26, and to Request No. 19 to the extent of his knowledge after making reasonable inquiry, and Attorney Sadin must respond by November 22, 2019, to GSK 's Requests for Admission Nos. 6-11, 13--15, and 21-27, and to Request ~o. 20 to the extent of his knowledge after making reasonable inquiry. It is so ORDERED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?