BROWN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION

Filing 3

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO REMAND IN BROWN (C.A. 09-809) IS DENIED. THE MOTION TO REMAND IN MARTINEZ (C.A. 08-5847) IS GRANTED AND THE ACTION IS REMANDED TO THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, RIO ARRIBA COUNTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 6/17/09. 6/18/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ah)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA _________________________________________ : IN RE: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES : MDL NO. 1871 PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS : 07-md-1871 LIABILITY LITIGATION : __________________________________________: THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: : : William B. Brown v. SmithKline Beecham : 2:09-cv-00809 Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline : : Cornelio Martinez, et al. v. SmithKline Beecham : 2:08-cv-05847 Corp. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, et al. : _________________________________________ : ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2009, upon consideration of the Motions to Remand filed in the above-captioned individual actions, and all briefs and argument submitted in support thereof or in opposition thereto, and in accordance with the attached Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Remand in Brown (case number 2:09-cv-00809) [MDL Master Docket Doc. No. 331] is DENIED; 2. The Motion to Remand in Martinez (case number 2:08-cv-05847) [MDL Master Docket Doc. No. 305] is GRANTED and the action is REMANDED to the First Judicial District Court for the State of New Mexico, Rio Arriba County. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe _______________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?