HALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 39

ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED AND THE THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF TO AMEND HIS COMPLAINT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 5/19/10. 5/19/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID HALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of May, 2010, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the motion of defendants to dismiss the amended CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-888 complaint is GRANTED; and (2) DENIED. BY THE COURT: the motion of plaintiff to amend his complaint is /s/ Harvey Bartle III C.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?