NIPPO CORPORATION/INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE CORPORATION v. AMEC EARTH & ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Filing 61

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 12/11/2009. 12/14/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NIPPO CORPORATION/INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE CORPORATION, A JOINT VENTURE Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, v. AMEC EARTH & ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. Defendant and Counterclaimant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-cv-0956 ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of December 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Re: Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition and Brief In Support of Plaintiff's Motion [docket entry Nos. 44 and 45], Defendant's Brief In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Re: Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition [docket entry No. 49], Plaintiff's Reply Brief In Support of Motion for Protective Order Re: Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition [docket entry No. 54], and Defendant's Sur-Reply Brief In Support of Opposition to Motion for Protective Order Re: Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition [docket entry No. 58], and for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe ___________________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?