SOLIS v. KORESKO et al

Filing 1554

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE OBJECTION BY THE NEWELL PLAN (DOC. NO. 1441 ), IS SUSTAINED. THE NEWELL PLAN IS CONSIDERED SEPARATE FOR PURPOSES OF THE EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF THE TRUSTS' ASSETS/ MARCUM A ND WILMINGTON TRUST WILL WORK TOGETHER TO DISENTANGLE THE NEWELL PLAN ASSETS AND ANY ISSUES THAT ARISE BY SUCH PROCESS ARE REFERRED TO JUDGE HEY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/8/2017. 8/8/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, COUNSEL AND J. KORESKO AND E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
Case 2:09-cv-00988-WB Document 1545-1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, CIVIL ACTION SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v. JOHN J. KORESKO, V, et al. NO. 09-988 ORDER AND NOW, this 'ff" day of ~IA\\,. , 201 7, upon consideration of the Department of Labor's Motion for Equitable Distribution (Doc. 1384), the Unified Model of Distribution, the Objection filed by W. S. Newell & Sons, Inc. (Doc. 1441), the DOL's initial response (Doc. 1448), the supplemental briefing and accompanying documentation (Docs. 1478, 1479, 1516, and 1517), the additional documentation and accounting provided by Marcum, the transcript of the hearing held on May 25, 2017, and after careful and independent review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 2. The Objection by the Newell Plan (Doc. 1441) is SUSTAINED. Case 2:09-cv-00988-WB Document 1545-1 Filed 07/12/17 Page 2 of 2 3. The Newell Plan is considered separate for purposes of the equitable distribution of the Trusts' assets. 4. Marcum and Wilmington Trust will work together to disentangle the Newell Plan assets and any issues that arise by such process are referred to Judge Hey. WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?