SOLIS v. KORESKO et al
Filing
56
ORDER THAT DEFT JEANNE BONNEY'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT (DOC #51) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT MS. BONNEY AND THE OTHER KORESKO DEFTS SHALL FILE THEIR JOINT RESPONSE TO PLFF'S COMPLAINT FORTHWITH. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 6/23/09. ) 6/25/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HILDA L. SOLIS, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Plaintiff, v. JOHN J. KORESKO, V, JEANNE BONNEY, PENN-MONT BENEFIT SERVICES, INC., KORESKO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., KORESKO LAW FIRM, P.C., COMMUNITY TRUST COMPANY, PENN PUBLIC TRUST, REGIONAL EMPLOYERS ASSURANCE LEAGUES VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES' BENEFICIARY ASSOCIATION TRUST, and SINGLE EMPLOYER WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN TRUST, Defendants
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Civil Action No. 09-988
ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of June, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant Jeanne Bonney's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer to Complaint (Doc. No. 51) and Plaintiff's Response thereto (Doc. No. 52), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Ms. Bonney and the other Koresko Defendants shall file their joint response to Plaintiff's Complaint forthwith. BY THE COURT:
S/ C. Darnell Jones II J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?