MARRICONE v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
ORDER to MEMORANDUM AND/OR ORDER (DOC. #36) IT IS ORDERED that DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN PART, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO DEFENDANTS AND GRANTED IN PART:. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FCRA CLAIMS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RAISE AT A LATER STATE IN THE LITIGATION..... SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 10/6/2009. 10/6/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN MARRICONE, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et. al., Defendants
: : : : : : : : : : :
AND NOW, this _6th __ day of October 2009, it is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in part, without prejudice to Defendants, and GRANTED in part:
Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's FCRA claims is DENIED, without prejudice to raise at a later stage in the litigation.
Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's defamation claim is DENIED, without prejudice to raise at a later stage in the litigation and to raise any preemption issues regarding state law tort claims.
Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's invasion of privacy claim is GRANTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's requests for equitable relief is DENIED, without prejudice to raise at a later stage in the litigation.
s/Anita B. Brody _______________________
ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on _________ to:
Copies MAILED on _______ to:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?