TUCKER v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
Filing
34
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED, AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL CLAIMS; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 12/29/10. 12/30/10 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
TUCKER v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
Doc. 34
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA F L A K E W O O D ALAN TUCKER, III v. T H O M A S JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY : : : : : ORDER A N D NOW, this 29th day of December, 2010, "Defendant Thomas Jefferson U n iv e rs ity's Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment" (docket no. 31) is granted, and ju d g m e n t is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on all claims.1 C IV IL ACTION
N o . 09-1197
B Y THE COURT:
/s/ Edmund V. Ludwig______ E d m u n d V. Ludwig, J.
In his memorandum in opposition to defendant's original motions for summary judgment, plaintiff withdrew the retaliation claim, see plaintiff's memorandum, docket no. 27, at 10. Plaintiff did not oppose defendant's motion as to the gender discrimination claim.
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?