KIRKWOOD v. ASTRUE

Filing 24

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO.14) IS NOT APPROVED AND NOT ADOPTED; REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED INSOFAR AS PLAINTIFF REQUESTS A REMAND; THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 8/11/2010. 8/16/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA K E V A N N E A. KIRKWOOD, P la in tif f , C iv il Action No. 09-1347 v. M IC H A E L J. ASTRUE, Commissioner o f Social Security, D e f e n d a n t. ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2010, upon consideration of the plaintiffclaimant's Motion in Support of Review, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart, plaintiff's objections (docket no. 15), and defendant's response (docket no. 16), and for the reasons provided in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (docket no. 14) is NOT APPROVED and NOT A DO P TE D ; 2. Request for Review is GRANTED insofar as plaintiff requests a remand; 3. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with this Memorandum and Order. JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2010, in accordance with Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399 (3d Cir.1994), and Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered REVERSING the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and REMANDING the matter to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with my Memorandum and Order of today. B Y THE COURT: /s/ Louis H. Pollak P o lla k , J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?