JOOBEEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al

Filing 32

ORDERED THAT MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOCKET NOS. 23 AND 25) ARE GRANTED AND ALL CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED. DEFENDANTS CAMCO MANAGEMENT CO.'S AND MARIE O'BRIEN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 24) IS MOOT. ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT S JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 AND JOHN DOE 3 ARE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 2/28/11. 2/28/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(rab, )

Download PDF
JOOBEEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALI JOOBEEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of February 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution (Docket No. 25), and Defendants' CAMCO Management Co. and Marie O'Brien's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Docket No. 23), and following a hearing held on October 1, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motions (Docket Nos. 25 and 23) are GRANTED, and all claims against Defendants City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia Police Department, Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey, Police Officers Fernando Garcia and Beth Babbs, CAMCO Management Co., and Marie O'Brien are DISMISSED. 2. Defendants CAMCO Management Co.'s and Marie O'Brien's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 24) is MOOT. 3. All claims against Defendants John Doe 1 (Police Driver of Tow Truck #G12, Vehicle #97503), John Doe 2 (Police Officer Badge #4799), and John Doe 3 (Police Officer Badge #8900) are DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. 4. The Clerk of the Court shall CLOSE this case for all purposes. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER United States District Judge CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1376 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?