HORNE v. TENNIS et al

Filing 33

ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER FRCP 60(b) (ECF NO. 27) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/24/14. 11/25/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RONALD HORNE,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Petitioner,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT FRANKLIN
TENNIS, et al.
Respondents.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 09-1562

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 24th day of November, 2014, for the reasons
set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
that Petitioner’s Motion for Relief Under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 60(b) (ECF No. 27) is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.

1