PUGH v. CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA, LLC et al

Filing 28

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CHESTER DOWNS' AND DEFENDANT DOUGHTERTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN; DEFENDANT ONICK'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/27/2009. 7/28/2009 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ap, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANLEY A. PUGH, : : Plaintiff, : : : v. : : CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA, LLC,: et al., : : Defendants. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1572

ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2009, following a hearing on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (doc. nos. 18 and 22), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant Chester Downs' and Defendant Dougherty's

Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 22) is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. It is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to dismiss

Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims [Counts I - IV] against Defendant Dougherty. It is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to dismiss

Plaintiff's state malicious prosecution claim [Count VI] against Defendant Dougherty. 2. GRANTED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. Defendant Onick's Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 18) is