LIBERI et al v. TAITZ et al

Filing 118

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION SEEKS TOSEVER AND TRANSFER THIS CASE FROM THE EASTERN DISTRIVT OF PA, THE MOTION IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC #10) IS DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS CASE SHALL BE MARKED CLOSED. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/3/10. ) 6/4/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gn, ) Modified on 6/4/2010 (gn, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LISA LIBERI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ORLY TAITZ, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1898 ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED that to the extent that Defendants' motion seeks to sever and transfer this case from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will now SEVER the instant case into two separate, independent actions and TRANSFER each action to the jurisdiction of the following district courts. All claims pending against Defendants Linda Sue Belcher, Edgar Hale, Caren Hale, Plains Radio Network, Bar H. Farms, and KPRN A.M. 1610, Neil Sankey and Sankey Investigations, Inc. are transferred to the Western District Court of Texas. claims pending against Defendants Orly Taitz and Defend Our Freedoms Foundations are transferred to the Southern Division of the Central District of California. All IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion to transfer (doc. no. 10) is DENIED as moot.1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be marked CLOSED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. All requests for leave to file pleadings submitted during the time the case was in suspense from December 9, 2009 to June 2, 2010, and of which only one letter was made part of the docket (see Berg Letter in Opp'n to Def. Taitz, dated Jan. 10, 2010, doc. no. 116), are denied as moot. -2- 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?