BURLINGTON v. NEWS CORPORATION et al

Filing 103

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DAN GROSS AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA TO INTERVENE (DOC. NO. 83 ), IS DENIED. DAN GROSS AND NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA ARE NEVERTHELESS GRANTED AMICUS CURIAE STATUS. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. NO. 79 ), IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 5/4/2015. 5/5/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES FAXED BY CHAMBERS; MAILED TO COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS BURLINGTON v. NEWS CORPORATION, ET AL. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-1908 ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Compel the Production Of The Settlement Agreement From Plaintiff’s Chester County Lawsuit (ECF No. 79), and the Motion of Dan Gross and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA to Intervene to Assert Their Confidentiality Interests (ECF No. 83), and all papers and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Motion of Dan Gross and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA to Intervene (ECF No. 83) is DENIED. Dan Gross and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA are nevertheless granted amicus curiae status. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Compel (ECF No. 79) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: _________________________ R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?