GRIBBLE v. FOLINO et al

Filing 15

ORDER THAT: BY 11/23/09, PETITIONER SHALL INFORM THE COURT HOW HE WOULD LIKE TO PROCEED WITH HIS PETITION FILED UNDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254. IF PETITIONER CHOOSES TO PROCEED WITH HIS HABEAS PETITION AS FILED, RESPONDENTS SHALL FILE A RESPONSE ADDRESSING THE MERITS OF PETITIONER'S CLAIMS BY 12/23/09, ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 11/10/09. 11/12/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM GRIBBLE, Petitioner, v. LOUIS S. FOLINO, et al. Respondents. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 09-2091 AND NOW, this 10TH day of November, 2009, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. By November 23, 2009, Petitioner shall inform the Court how he would like to proceed with his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner shall do so by completing and signing the check-off form that is attached to this Order. Petitioner shall also send a copy of the completed check-off form to the District Attorney. 2. If petitioner chooses to proceed with his habeas petition as filed, Respondents shall file a response addressing the merits of petitioner's claims by December 23, 2009. No further extensions will be granted. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lynne A. Sitarski LYNNE A. SITARSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM GRIBBLE, Petitioner, v. LOUIS S. FOLINO, et al. Respondents. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 09-2091 [ ] I would like to withdraw my § 2254 petition in order to file one (1) all-inclusive petition with the understanding that it must be filed within the one (1) year statute of limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). [ ] I would like to proceed with the four claims asserted in my § 2254 petition as filed. DATE: _____________________________ Petitioner

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?