BAYLIS v. ASTRUE

Filing 20

ORDER TAHT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES IS DISMISSED AS MOOT; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 8/3/11. 8/3/11 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN BAYLIS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. No. 09-2217 MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2011, upon consideration of plaintiff’s Request for Review (Docket No. 3), plaintiff’s memorandum in support of that request (Docket No. 8), defendant’s response thereto (Docket No. 9), plaintiff’s reply to defendant’s response (Docket No. 10), the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Docket No. 12), plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 13), this court’s prior memorandum opinion and order (Docket Nos. 14 and 15), defendant’s motion to alter or amend judgement (Docket No. 16), and the entire record herein, and for the reasons provided in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s motion to alter or amend the judgment is GRANTED; 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 3. Plaintiff’s Request for Review is DENIED; and 4. Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees (Docket No. 17) is DISMISSED as moot. BY THE COURT /s/ Louis H. Pollak Pollak, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?