DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERVICES, LLC v. THIRD PILLAR SYSTEMS, INC.

Filing 307

ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFF DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL SERVICE, LLC IN LIMINE IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT PLAINTIFF MAY INTRODUCE INTO EVIDENCE THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF DR. JAMES WOODS IN SUPPORT OF UNJUST ENRICHMENT DAMAGES, BUT THE MOTION IS OTHERWISE DENIED, AND THE RENEWED MOTION OF DEFENDANT THIRD PILLAR SYSTEMS, INC. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 2/2/2012. 2/2/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DE LAGE LANDEN OPERATIONAL
SERVICES, LLC
v.
THIRD PILLAR SYSTEMS, INC.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 09-2439

ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2012, for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby
ORDERED that:
(1)

the motion of plaintiff De Lage Landen Operational

Services, LLC in limine to introduce evidence in support of
unjust enrichment damages and/or a reasonable royalty for Third
Pillar's Misappropriation of plaintiff's trade secrets (Doc.
#285) is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff may introduce into
evidence the deposition testimony of Dr. James Woods in support
of unjust enrichment damages, but the motion is otherwise DENIED;
and
(2)

the renewed motion of defendant Third Pillar

Systems, Inc. for summary judgment (Doc. #291) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III
J.