FUREY v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 168

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF TEMPLE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 125 , THE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION, THE DEFENDANTS' REPLY, THE PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANTS' REPLY, AND AFTER ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON 6/25 /2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, FOR THE REASONS STATED IN A MEMORANDUM OF TODAY'S DATE, THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN ITS ENTIRETY AS OF TO DEFENDANTS ANN WEAVER HART, M. MOSHE PARAT, JONATHAN SCOTT, BONITA SILVERMAN, AND THE TRUSTEES OF TEMPLE UNIVERSITY. WITH RESPECT TO ALL OTHER DEFENDANTS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED ON ALL CLAIMS EXCEPT THE DUE PROCESS CLAIM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 8/2/10. 8/3/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
FUREY v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al Doc. 168 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEVIN FUREY v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, et al. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2010, upon consideration of Temple Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 125), the plaintiff's opposition, the defendants' reply, the plaintiff's response to the defendants' reply, and after oral argument held on June 25, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a Memorandum of today's date, that the motion is granted in its entirety as to defendants Ann Weaver Hart, M. Moshe Parat, Jonathan Scott, Bonita Silverman, and the Trustees of Temple University. With respect to all other CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-2474 defendants, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted on all claims except the due process claim. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mary A. McLaughlin MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?