FUREY v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
295
ORDER THAT JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES. FOLLOWING THE COURT'S 8/2/2012 MEMORANDUM OF LAW, JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE UNIVERSITY REVIEW BOARD. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENT ERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST TEMPLE UNIVERSITY AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES ON THE PLAINTIFF'S PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS CLAIM. THE PLAINTIFF'S EXPULSION FROM TEMPLE UNIVERSITY IS VACATED. THE PLAINT IFF SHALL BE REINSTATED AS A STUDENT AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY UNLESS GIVEN A NEW HEARING THAT COMPORTS WITH DUE PROCESS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. THIS CASE IS NOW CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 8/3/12. 8/3/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN FUREY
:
:
:
:
:
v.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, et al.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 09-2474
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2012, following a
bench trial in the above captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s
date, that:
1.
Judgment shall be entered in favor of the
individual defendants in their individual capacities.
2.
Following the Court’s August 2, 2012 memorandum of
law, judgment shall be entered in favor of the University Review
Board.
3.
Judgment shall be entered in favor of the
plaintiff and against Temple University and the individual
defendants in their official capacities on the plaintiff’s
procedural due process claim.
The plaintiff’s expulsion from
Temple University is vacated.
The plaintiff shall be reinstated
as a student at Temple University unless given a new hearing that
comports with due process within sixty (60) days
of this order.
4.
This case is now closed.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?