FUREY v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 296

AMENDED ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES. FOLLOWING THE COURT'S 8/2/2012 MEMORANDUM OF LAW, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE UNIVERSITY REVIEW BOARD. JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF AGAINST TEMPLE UNIVERSITY AND THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES ON THE PLAINTIFF'S PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS CLAIM. THE PLAINTIFF'S EXPULSION FROM TEMPLE UNIVERSITY IS VACATED. THE PLAINTIFF SHALL BE REINSTATED AS A STUDENT AT TEMPLE UNIVERSITY UNLESS GIVEN A NEW HEARING THAT COMPORTS WITH DUE PROCESS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. THIS CASE IS NOW CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 8/6/12. 8/6/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KEVIN FUREY
v.
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 09-2474

AMENDED ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2012, following a
bench trial in the above captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,
for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing the date of
August 3, 2013, that:
1.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the

individual defendants in their individual capacities.
2.

Following the Court’s August 2, 2012 memorandum of

law, judgment is hereby entered in favor of the University Review
Board.
3.

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the

plaintiff and against Temple University and the individual
defendants in their official capacities on the plaintiff’s
procedural due process claim.

The plaintiff’s expulsion from

Temple University is vacated.

The plaintiff shall be reinstated

as a student at Temple University unless given a new hearing that
comports with due process within sixty (60) days of this order.
4.

This case is now closed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin
MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.