BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al

Filing 29

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED WITH THE AFORESAID CLARIFICATION; THE PETIITON FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/28/10. 7/29/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED. (COPY TO PRO SE)(lvj, )

BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al

Doc. 29

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA REGINALD BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2010, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate CIVIL ACTION

NO. 09-2486

Judge is APPROVED and ADOPTED with the aforesaid clarification; (2) the petition for writ of habeas corpus is

DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and (3) petitioner has neither shown a denial of a

constitutional right nor established that reasonable jurists would disagree with this court's disposition of his claims. Consequently, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III C.J.

Dockets.Justia.com