HARCUM v. LEBLANC

Filing 53

ORDER AS FOLLOWS: PLFF'S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEW THE MOTION IN THE EVENT OFFICER ROBINSON AND/OR OFFICER SINGLETON FAIL TO ANSWER PLFF'S INTERROGATORIES; AND PLFF'S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 7/15/10. 7/16/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

HARCUM v. LEBLANC

Doc. 53

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

D A R R E N HARCUM

v. M A R C E L LEBLANC

: : : : : :

C IV IL ACTION

N O . 09-2512

ORDER A N D NOW, this 15th day of July 2010, after consideration of Plaintiff's first m o tio n to compel discovery (Doc. 41) and second motion to compel discovery (Doc. 43), a n d any responses and replies thereto, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. P la in tif f 's first motion to compel discovery (Doc. 41) is DENIED W IT H O U T PREJUDICE to renew the motion in the event Officer R o b in s o n and/or Officer Singleton fail to answer Plaintiff's interrogatories; and 2. P la in tif f 's second motion to compel discovery (Doc. 43) is GRANTED IN P A R T AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted insofar as D e f e n d a n t shall provide Plaintiff with a complete copy of his medical re c o rd s and the names of the corrections officers and any other prison p e rs o n n e l who are mentioned on Graterford's Special Needs Unit logbooks f o r the 2200 hours shift of November 16, 2008. The motion is denied in all o th e r respects. B Y THE COURT: _ /s/ Elizabeth T. Hey ELIZABETH T. HEY U N IT E D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com