KARAKOZOVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

Filing 58

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE COURT WILL CONSIDER AND DECIDE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A RESPONSE UNLESS PLAINTIFF FILES A RESPONSE BY 4/18/2011. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 3/24/2011. 3/24/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(stwe, )

Download PDF
KARAKOZOVA v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARINA V. KARAKOZOVA, PH.D., : : v. : : THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY : OF PENNSYLVANIA : : ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of March 2011, upon consideration of plaintiff's "Motion to Strike Verified Statement of Dr. Anna Kashina and Motion for More Definite Statement" and defendant's response thereto, it is ORDERED that the motions are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the Court will consider and decide defendant's motion for summary judgment without the benefit of a response unless plaintiff files a response to defendant's pending motion for summary judgment by April 18, 2011. CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-02564 s/Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr. THOMAS N. O'NEILL, JR., J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?