BROWN v. LAWLER et al
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER, PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AND PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLL OWS: THE OBJECTIONS 16 TO THE REPORT ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL 13 IS DENIED. NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 10/13/16. 10/14/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT LAWLER, ET AL.
AND NOW, this
, 2016, upon consideration of the
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Thomas J. Rueter, Petitioner=s Objections to Magistrate=s Report and Recommendation, and
Petitioner=s Motion to Appoint Counsel, and all papers submitted in support thereof and in
opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
The Objections to Magistrate=s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) are
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with
Petitioner=s Motion to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 13) is DENIED.
No certificate of appealability will issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?