BROWN v. ASTRUE

Filing 20

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS ADOPTED IN PART AND REJECTED IN PART. THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY IS AFFIRMED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/4/10. 11/4/10 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANI PA]'.:lELA BROW;>;, Plaintiff. v, MICIIAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. CIVIL NO, 09-3747 F'lED 10\0 KuNZ. Cled< ORDER ,t""...-f'----'0 oep,QeII< AND NOW. this 4th Jay ofNovember, 2010, upon consider ofPlaintiifs Brief awl Statement ofl';sues In Support of Request for Revievl" [Doc, No.8]. Defendant's Response [Doc, No, 141, Plaintiffs Reply [Doc, No, 15], Magistrate Judge Rueter's Report & Recommendation [Doc. No. t6], PlaintitI's Objections thereto [Doc. No. 17], Defendant's Response [Doc. No, 18L and a review ofthe Record in the above-captioned matter, and for the reasons set forth in the attached :Memorandum Opinion, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 1. 2. Plaintiff's Objections arc OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in pari and REJECTED in part; 3. 4, The decision of the Commissioner ofSocial Security is AFFIRMED; The Clerk o[Omn is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED. It is so ORDERED,

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?