BUTT, ET AL v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS & JOINERS OF AMERICA et al

Filing 449

ORDER THAT PADDICK'S MOTION FOR ORDER OF CONTEMPT IS GRANTED. THOMPSON WILL BE HELD IN CIVIL CONTEMPT FOR HER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OUR 6/18/2018 ORDER (DOC. 381). THOMPSON SHALL COMPENSATE PADDICK $14,760.50 FOR THE ATTORNEY TIME HE INCURRED AS A RESULT OF HER NON-COMPLIANCE WITH OUR ORDER. THIS PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE BY 1/10/2019. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE ON 12/27/18. 12/28/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED: COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RYAN M. PADDICK Movant v. : CIVIL ACTION : : NO. 09-4285 : SHENECQUA BUTT; THERESA HOWARD; and. : ELLEN BRONSON, a/k/a ELLEN BROWN : Respondents : ___________________________________________________________________________ RYAN M. PADDICK : CIVIL ACTION Movant : v. : NO. 13-374 : THERESA HOWARD : Respondent : ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of December, 2018, upon consideration of Ryan Paddick, Esq.’s Motion for Contempt (Doc. 393), Sandra Thompson, Esq.’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 406) and Brief in Opposition to the Motions for Contempt (Doc 406-5), Paddick’s Pre-Hearing Memorandum (Doc. 444), Thompson’s Pre-Hearing Memorandum (Doc. 443), Paddick’s posthearing Summary of Costs and Time (Doc. 445), and Thompson’s Reply thereto (Doc. 447), and for the reasons set forth in our accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Paddick’s “Motion for Order of Contempt” is GRANTED. 2. Thompson will be held in civil contempt for her non-compliance with our June 18, 2018 Order. (Doc. 381.) 3. Thompson shall compensate Paddick $14,760.50 for the attorney time he incurred as a result of her non-compliance with our Order. This payment shall be made by Thursday, January 10, 2019. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT: Date: December 27, 2018 /s/ David R. Strawbridge, USMJ DAVID R. STRAWBRIDGE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?