QUINN v. MERCY FITZGERALD HOSPITAL
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MERCY FITZGERALD HOSPITAL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART, AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF THE MOTION ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM THAT DEFENDANT TERMINATED HER BECAUSE SHE TOOK LEAVE PROTECTED UNDER THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, IS DENIED; AND THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 7/22/2011. 7/22/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KATHRYN M. QUINN,
MERCY FITZGERALD HOSPITAL,
AND NOW, this 22nd day of July 2011, upon consideration of Defendant Mercy
Fitzgerald Hospital’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 21, filed June 2, 2011) and
Plaintiff Kathryn M. Quinn’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Document No. 23, filed July 5, 2011), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum
dated July 22, 2011, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital’s Motion for
Summary Judgment is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART, as follows:
1. That part of the motion addressing plaintiff’s claim that defendant terminated her
because she took leave protected under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et
seq., is DENIED; and
2. The motion is GRANTED in all other respects.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
JAN E. DUBOIS, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?