HOWARD v. WAL-MART SUPERCENTER et al

Filing 8

ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC #3) IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH INTHE PRECEDING MEMORANDUM OPINION. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 11/30/09. ) 12/2/09 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BLONDELL HOWARD vs. WAL-MART SUPERCENTER and WAL-MART STORES, INC.

: CIVIL ACTION : : : NO. 09-CV-4530 : :

ORDER

AND NOW, this

30th

day of November, 2009, upon

consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 3) and Defendant's Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the preceding Memorandum Opinion. BY THE COURT:

s/J. Curtis Joyner J. CURTIS JOYNER,

J.