MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. AUGUSTIN et al

Filing 80

ORDER THAT THE PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REDACTIONOF TRANSCRIPTS (DOC #72) IS DENIED, BOTH AS TO THE REQUEST FOR THE WITHHOLDING FROM THE PUBLIC THE ENTIRE TRANSCRIPTS AND AS TO THE REQUEST FOR THE REDACTION OF SPECIFIC SECTIONS. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 8/5/10. ) 8/6/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gn, )

MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. AUGUSTIN et al

Doc. 80

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

M A A C O FRANCHISING, INC., P la in tif f , v. P IE R R E PHILIPPE AUGUSTIN, et al., D e f e n d a n ts.

C iv il Action No. 09-4548

ORDER A u g u s t 5, 2010 A N D NOW, this 5th day of August, 2010, for the reasons set forth in the a c c o m p a n yin g memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's request for re d a c tio n of transcripts (docket no. 72) is DENIED, both as to the request for the w ith h o ld in g from the public the entire transcripts and as to the request for the redaction of s p e c if ic sections.. B Y THE COURT: Pollak, J.

/s/ Louis H. Pollak P o lla k , J.

Dockets.Justia.com