FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. et al v. THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.

Filing 230

JUDGMENT ORDER THAT THE COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE GOVERNMENT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS ON PLAINTIFFS' AS APPLIED AND FACIAL CLAIMS UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT. THE COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE GOVERNMENT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS ON PLAINTIFFS AS-APPLIED AND FACIAL CLAIMS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCEPT IN ONE REGARD--THE FAILURE OF THE REGULATIONS TO REQUIRE RECEIPT OF ADVANCE NOTICE, FOR INSPECTIONS AT BONA FIDE RESIDENCES OF PRODUCERS, VIOLATES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, AND THE COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AS TO THIS SINGLE ISSUE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 7/18/13. 7/18/13 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. et al. Plaintiffs, v. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION : THE HONORABLE ERIC H. HOLDER, JR: : Defendant. : 09-4607 JUDGMENT AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2013, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(a) and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, the Court enters judgment in FAVOR of the government and AGAINST Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs’ as-applied and facial claims under the First Amendment. The Court enters judgment in FAVOR of the government and AGAINST Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs’ as-applied and facial claims under the Fourth Amendment except in one regard – the failure of the regulations to require receipt of advance notice, for inspections at bona fide residences of producers, violates the Fourth Amendment, and the Court enters judgment in FAVOR of Plaintiffs and AGAINST the government as to this single issue. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson ________________________ Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 09\09-4607 Free Speech v. Holder\Final Judgment.docx 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?