STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA v. COMCAST CORPORATION et al

Filing 18

ORDER OF MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION (DOC. #17) - UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF REMOVAL (DOC. #12), PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. #13), PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. #14), DEFENDANTS&# 039; MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND (DOC. #15), AND PLAINTIFF'S REPLY (DOC. #16), IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 3/31/2010. 3/31/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA ex rel. DARRELL V. MCGRAW, Jr., Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. COMCAST CORP., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4671 ORDER AND NOW, this ___31st____ day of March, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Notice of Removal (Doc. #12), Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #13), Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Remand (Doc. #14), Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Doc. #15), and Plaintiff's Reply (Doc. #16), it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED. s/Anita B. Brody ANITA B. BRODY, J. Copies VIA ECF on to: Copies MAILED on to:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?