BAINBRIDGE v. ACME MARKETS, INC.
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS LISTED IN THIS ORDER ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDMUND V. LUDWIG ON 3/15/2012; 3/15/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ACME MARKETS, INC.
AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2012, the following are denied:
“Objections of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge to the July 15, 2011 Order of
Magistrate Judge Caracappa on Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions” (doc. no. 54).
The objections set forth in “Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.’s Response to
Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge Caracappa’s Order of July 15, 2011"
(doc. no. 55).
The objections set forth in “Opposition of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge to
Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.’s Untimely Appeal of Magistrate Judge
Caracappa’s Order of July 15, 2011" (doc. no. 56).
“Defendant Acme Markets, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (doc. no.
“Motion of Plaintiff Valerie Bainbridge for Partial Summary Judgment on
Count III of Her Complaint for Unpaid Overtime Pursuant to the Fair Labor
Standards Act” (doc. no. 36).
As to the defense of statute of limitations under the PHRA, §§ 43 P.S. 951-963 and
the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219, the factual records have not been fully developed and,
therefore, these rulings will be reserved until trial.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edmund V. Ludwig
Edmund V. Ludwig, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?