PERELMAN et al v. PERELMAN

Filing 101

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS (DOC. NO.45)IS GRANTED. ALL OF RAYMOND'S COUNTERCLAIMS ARE HEREBY DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNT I OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE SOLE REMAINING COUNT IN THIS CASE, IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ALSO DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 5/2/2013. 5/2/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED. (kk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEFFREY E. PERELMAN, et al. v. RAYMOND G. PERELMAN : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4792 ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2013, upon consideration of the plaintiffs’ original motion to dismiss counterclaims (Docket No. 45), the response in opposition, and the reply thereto; And also upon consideration of the plaintiffs’ renewed motion to dismiss counterclaims and motion for summary judgment on Count I of the Amended Complaint (Docket No. 97), the response in opposition, and the reply thereto; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s date, that: 1) The plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss Raymond G. Perelman’s counterclaims is GRANTED. All of Raymond’s counterclaims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 2) Count I of the amended complaint, the sole remaining count in this case, is DISMISSED AS MOOT. In view of that decision, the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is also DENIED as moot. 3) The Clerk shall mark this case as closed. BY THE COURT: _/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin_ MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?