TELLADO et al v. INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES et al
Filing
55
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT ONEWEST BANK, FSB SHALL REFUND ALL PAYMENTS MADE UNDER THE MORTGAGE REFINANCING LOAN AGREEMENT WITH PLAINTIFFS, CANCEL AND RETURN ANY NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY THE PLAINTIFFS IN CONNECTION WITH SUCH MORTGAGE REFINANCING TRANSACTION, AND TAKE ANY ACTION NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE TO TERMINATE PROMPTLY ANY SECURITY INTEREST CREATED IN THE MORTGAGE REFINANCING TRANSACTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 7/25/2011. 8/9/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSE TELLADO AND
MARIA TELLADO,
Plaintiffs,
v.
INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES,
a division of One West Bank, FSB,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 09-5022
ORDER
AND NOW, this ___ of July, 2011, upon consideration of the evidence presented at the bench
trial held in this matter on November 8, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that
Defendant OneWest Bank, FSB shall refund all payments made under the mortgage refinancing loan
agreement with Plaintiffs, cancel and return any negotiable instrument executed by the Plaintiffs in
connection with such mortgage refinancing transaction, and take any action necessary or appropriate to
terminate promptly any security interest created in the mortgage refinancing transaction.1
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Petrese B. Tucker
__________________________________
Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.
1
The above remedy is permissible under 73 P.S. § 201-7(g). This Court’s accompanying bench trial
memorandum, dated July 25, 2011, sets forth the Court’s rationale for the present Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?