SELZER et al v. DUNKIN' DONUTS INCORPORATED et al

Filing 46

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 10 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/20/11. 4/21/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HAROLD SELTZER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUNKIN’ DONUTS, Inc., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 09-5484 ORDER AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART, as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED with regard to Counts II, VI, X and XIV of the Complaint, which present third-party beneficiary claims on behalf of Plaintiffs AAA Development & Management, AAA Development Group, AAA Yowza and Yowza Enterprises (collectively, “the Entity Plaintiffs”); and Counts IV, VIII, XII and XVI of the Complaint, which present tortious interference claims on behalf of the Entity Plaintiffs. 2. The Motion is DENIED with regard to Counts III, VII, XI and XV of the Complaint, which present promissory estoppel claims on behalf of the Entity Plaintiffs; and Counts V, IX, XIII and XVII of the Complaint, which present fraudulent misrepresentation claims on behalf of the Entity Plaintiffs. BY THE COURT: __S/Gene E.K.Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?