SELZER et al v. DUNKIN' DONUTS INCORPORATED et al
Filing
46
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 10 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 4/20/11. 4/21/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HAROLD SELTZER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DUNKIN’ DONUTS, Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 09-5484
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss (Docket No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in PART and
DENIED in PART, as follows:
1.
The Motion is GRANTED with regard to Counts II, VI, X and XIV of the
Complaint, which present third-party beneficiary claims on behalf of Plaintiffs
AAA Development & Management, AAA Development Group, AAA Yowza and
Yowza Enterprises (collectively, “the Entity Plaintiffs”); and Counts IV, VIII, XII
and XVI of the Complaint, which present tortious interference claims on behalf of
the Entity Plaintiffs.
2.
The Motion is DENIED with regard to Counts III, VII, XI and XV of the
Complaint, which present promissory estoppel claims on behalf of the Entity
Plaintiffs; and Counts V, IX, XIII and XVII of the Complaint, which present
fraudulent misrepresentation claims on behalf of the Entity Plaintiffs.
BY THE COURT:
__S/Gene E.K.Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?