DAVID et al v. ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al

Filing 195

ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS ARE GRANTED AS FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFFS' FEDERAL CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER THE REMAINING STATE-LAW CLAIMS WHICH ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE REA SSERTION OF THESE CLAIMS IN STATE COURT TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFFS CAN DO SO CONSISTENT WITH THE COURT'S RULINGS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/7/12. 8/8/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ : : : : : ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., : Defendants. : __________________________________________: COLLETTE DAVIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5520 ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of August 2012, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 182), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 188), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 193), and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this day, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs’ federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims which are DISMISSED without prejudice to the reassertion of these claims in state court to the extent Plaintiffs can do so consistent with the Court’s rulings. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe __________________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?