COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BOLICK et al

Filing 35

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE PETRESE B. TUCKER FOR THE APPEARANCE OF BIAS AND/OR PREJUDICE 28 , AND THE RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION THERETO 31 , FILED BY PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECR EED THAT DEFENDANTS/COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS' SECOND MOTION FOR THE RECUSAL OF JUDGE PETRESE TUCKER FOR THE APPEARANCE OF BIAS AND/OR PREJUDICE IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 9/9/10. 9/13/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )

COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BOLICK et al

Doc. 35

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS BOLICK, II, ET AL., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5604

ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of August, 2010, upon consideration of the Motion for the Recusal of Judge Petrese B. Tucker for the Appearance of Bias and/or Prejudice (Doc. 28), and the Responses in Opposition thereto (Doc. 31), filed by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs' Second Motion for the Recusal of Judge Petrese Tucker for the Appearance of Bias and/or Prejudice is DENIED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker _______________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Dockets.Justia.com