COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BOLICK et al

Filing 40

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WHICH THE COURT HAS CONSTRUED AS A MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD IS DE NIED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 12/20/10.12/22/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(ti, )

COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT v. BOLICK et al

Doc. 40

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNCIL ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS BOLICK, II, ET AL., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of December, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff Council Rock School District's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Doc. 27); Defendants' Thomas Bolick, II and Thomas Bolick, III Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 32); Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29); Plaintiff's Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 30) and Defendants' Motion for Leave to Reply to Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 33), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record is GRANTED.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5604

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment which the Court has construed as a Motion for Judgement on the Administrative Record is DENIED. Defendant's Motion For Leave to Reply is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case as CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker _______________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Dockets.Justia.com