MARKERT v. BECKER TECHNICAL STAFFING, INC. et al

Filing 27

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS JOAN AND HARVEY BECKER'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT 17 AND RESPONSES THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, FOR THE REASONS CONTAINED IN THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM, THAT THE MOTION IS GRANTED AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS JOAN AND HARVEY BECKER ARE HEREBY DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNT I OF PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 5/5/10. 5/7/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD MARKERT, Plaintiff, v. BECKER TECHNICAL STAFFING, INC., et al., Defendants.

: : : : : : : : : : ORDER

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-CV-5774

AND NOW, this

5th

day of May, 2010, upon consideration

of Defendants Joan and Harvey Becker's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 17) and responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED, for the reasons contained in the attached Memorandum, that the Motion is GRANTED and all claims against Defendants Joan and Harvey Becker are hereby DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to all Defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. BY THE COURT:

s/J. Curtis Joyner J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.