MEDINA v. SOBINA et al
ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/8/10. 6/8/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSE MEDINA v. RAYMOND J. SOBINA, et al.
: : : : :
ORDER AND NOW, this 8th day of June 2010, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Respondent's Answer thereto, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart dated May 4, 2010, and the petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. The petitioner's objections are OVERRULED; The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and 4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ____________________________ MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?