CEPHAS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY et al

Filing 18

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS 11 , IS GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST GWHCF ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE MOTION TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT GEO GROUP, INC. 11 , IS GRANTED, AND PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST GEO ARE DISMISSE D WITHOUT PREJUDICE; PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF TO CONTINUE COMPLAINT 13 , IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ORDER IS FILED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOUIS H. POLLAK ON 7/20/10. 7/20/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND UNREP, E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
C E P H A S v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTION FACILITY et al D o c . 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARREN L. CEPHAS, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION No. 09-6014 ORDER A N D NOW, this 19th day of July, 2010, for the reasons stated in the a c c o m p a n yin g memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1 ) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant George W. Hill Correctional Facility ( " G W H C F " ) (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims against GWHCF are d is m is s e d with prejudice; (2 ) The motion to dismiss filed by defendant GEO Group, Inc. ("GEO") (Docket N o . 11) is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims against GEO are dismissed without p r e ju d ic e ; (3 ) Plaintiff's Brief to Continue Complaint (Docket No. 13), construed as a motion to amend the complaint, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (4 ) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than thirty (30) days after the d a te this Order is filed. Dockets.Justia.com BY THE COURT: /s/Louis H. Pollak Pollak, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?