CLOSE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al

Filing 51

ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/3/12. 4/3/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VARIOUS PLAINTIFFS

v.

VARIOUS DEFENDANTS.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CONSOLIDATED UNDER
MDL 875
Transferred from the
Northern District
of California
Case Nos.: See Exhibit A
(attached hereto)

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED
that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant General Electric
Company (AGE@) in each of the cases identified on Exhibit A (attached
hereto) is GRANTED as to alleged asbestos exposure arising from
insulation; DENIED as to all other alleged asbestos exposure.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Exhibit A

Motions by General Electric Company
in Various Cases Transferred from the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of California

Name of Plaintiff (or
Decedent)

N.D. Cal.
Case No.

E.D. PA
Case No.

Doc.
No.

1

Charles Clemmer

05-4084

09-62917

27

2

Calvin Oxford

05-4946

09-64012

22

3

Albert Rice

05-4998

09-62922

16

4

Jack Reynolds

09-2806

09-80025

31

5

Richard Close

09-1269

09-70107

30