CLOSE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT GENERAL ELECTRIC IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 4/3/12. 4/3/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Transferred from the
Case Nos.: See Exhibit A
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED
that the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant General Electric
Company (AGE@) in each of the cases identified on Exhibit A (attached
hereto) is GRANTED as to alleged asbestos exposure arising from
insulation; DENIED as to all other alleged asbestos exposure.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Motions by General Electric Company
in Various Cases Transferred from the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of California
Name of Plaintiff (or
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?