LOGAN et al v. SALEM BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKINTOWN et al

Filing 36

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS MARY J. ANDERS AND RISA VETRI FERMAN TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 25 AND PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR A SUM CERTAIN FROM THEIR AD DAMNUM CLAUSE AND PARAGRAPH FOURTEEN (14) FROM THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 7/29/10. 8/2/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
LOGAN et al v. SALEM BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKINTOWN et al Doc. 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WALTER J. LOGAN, JR. and THE DELTA ALLIANCE, LLC, Plaintiffs, vs. SALEM BAPTIST CHURCH OF JENKINTOWN, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 10-cv-0144 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2010, upon consideration of the Motion of Defendants Mary J. Anders and Risa Vetri Ferman to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 25) and Plaintiffs' Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' request for a sum certain from their ad damnum clause and paragraph fourteen (14) from the First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. BY THE COURT: s/J. Curtis Joyner J CURTIS JOYNER, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?