MIKELL v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Filing 18

ORDER - UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #14), PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE (DOC. #15), AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY (DOC. #16) IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #14) IS GRANTED IN P ART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS:. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCRIMINATORY FAILURE TO PROMOTE CLAIM;. DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO ALL OTHER CLAIMS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 5/19/2011. 5/19/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AMMON MIKELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
d/b/a PHILADELPHIA MARRIOTT WEST,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 10-402

ORDER
AND NOW, this

19th

day of May, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant’s

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #14), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. #15), and Defendant’s
Reply (Doc. #16), it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #14)
is GRAN TED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
Defendant’s Motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s discriminatory failure to
promote claim;
Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED as to all other claims.

s/ Anita B. Brody
ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on _______ to:

Copies MAILED on _______ to: