HOLLANDER v. ETYMOTIC RESEARCH, INC.

Filing 39

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT, DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO TRANSFER AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PETRESE B. TUCKER ON 10/29/10. 11/2/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

HOLLANDER v. ETYMOTIC RESEARCH, INC.

Doc. 39

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BENTLEY A. HOLLANDER, Plaintiff, v. ETYMOTIC RESEARCH, INC., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of October, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant, Etymotic Research, Inc's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and/or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (Doc. 29); Plaintiff/Relator's Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 35); Defendant Etymotic Research, Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1401 (a) (Doc. 31); Plaintiff/Relator Bentley Hollander's Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 32); and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply (Doc. 36), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that Defendant's Motions are DENIED.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-526

BY THE COURT: /s/ Petrese B. Tucker _____________________________ Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Dockets.Justia.com