STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. FICCHI et al

Filing 73

ORDERED THAT THE KNOX/SHENKO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 45) IS DENIED. THE FICCHI DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 46) IS DENIED. THE KNOX/SHENKO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS (DOCKET NO. 65) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 5/4/12. 5/4/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE :
INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
:
STEPHEN FICCHI, et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 10-555

ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss
filed by the Knox/Shenko Defendants (Doc. No. 45), the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Ficchi
Defendants (Doc. No. 46), and the Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions filed by the Knox/Shenko
Defendants (Doc. No. 65), and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.

The Knox/Shenko Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 45) is DENIED.

2.

The Ficchi Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 46) is DENIED.

3.

The Knox/Shenko Defendants’ Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (Doc. No. 65) is
DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE