STOCKLEY et al v. DARBY BOROUGH et al
Filing
23
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 2/23/11. ) 2/24/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )
<![CDATA[
STOCKLEY et al v. DARBY BOROUGH et al
Doc. 23
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CURTIS STOCKLEY, JR., ET AL. v. DARBY BOROUGH, ET AL. : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant Robert Smythe's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 20), and Plaintiff's opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks dismissal of Counts II and III and the Fourth Amendment claim in Count I. 2. In all other respects, the Motion is DENIED. CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-688
BY THE COURT: /s/ John R. Padova, J.
John R. Padova, J.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
