PHILADELPHIA PROFESSIONAL COLLECTIONS, LLC v. YOUNG et al

Filing 9

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, IMPROPER VENUE, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO JOIN A PARTY UNDER RULE 19 4 , PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO 5 , AND DEFENDANTS' REPLY 7 AND FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 12/22/10. 12/22/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
PHILADELPHIA PROFESSIONAL COLLECTIONS, LLC v. YOUNG et al Doc. 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ PHILADELPHIA PROFESSIONAL : COLLECTIONS, LLC, : Plaintiff, : : v. : : ROBERT O. YOUNG, SHELLY R. YOUNG, : and HIKARI HOLDINGS LLC : Defendants. : __________________________________________: CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-cv-00724 ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of December 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, Improper Venue, Failure to State a Claim, and Failure to Join a Party Under Rule 19 [doc. no. 4 ], Plaintiff's Response thereto [doc. no. 5], and Defendants' Reply [doc. no. 7] and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is DENIED. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?