ANDRADE v. WALGREENS-OPTIONCARE, INC. et al

Filing 44

ORDER that PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ALL EVIDENCE RELATING TO PLAINTIFF'S IMMIGRATION STATUS AND EMPLOYMENT RECORDS (ECF NO. 20) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, AS EXPLAINED IN THE MEMORANDUM OF THE SAME DATE (ECF NO. 4 3). IT IT FURTHER ORDERED, AS READ ONTO THE RECORD AT THE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ON APRIL 7. 2011, THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND CERTAIN EVIDENCE THAT WAS ALLEGEDLY NOT TIMELY PRODUCED (ECF NO. 25) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 4/18/2011. 4/18/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JUAN ANDRADE,
Plaintiff,
v.
WALGREENS-OPTIONCARE, INC.,
OPTION CARE, INC., WALGREEN
EASTERN CO., INC., OPTION CARE
ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-CV-944

ORDER
AND NOW, this __18th__ day of April 2011, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion in
limine to exclude all evidence relating to Plaintiff’s immigration status and employment records
(ECF No. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained in the Memorandum of
this same date (ECF No. 43).
It is FURTHER ORDERED, as read onto the record at the Final Pre-Trial Conference
on April 7, 2011, that Plaintiff’s Motion in limine to exclude expert testimony and certain
evidence that was allegedly not timely produced (ECF No. 25) is DENIED.

s/Anita B. Brody
__________________________
ANITA B. BRODY, J.

Copies VIA ECF on _________ to:

Copies MAILED on _______ to: