ANDRADE v. WALGREENS-OPTIONCARE, INC. et al
ORDER that PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ALL EVIDENCE RELATING TO PLAINTIFF'S IMMIGRATION STATUS AND EMPLOYMENT RECORDS (ECF NO. 20) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, AS EXPLAINED IN THE MEMORANDUM OF THE SAME DATE (ECF NO. 4 3). IT IT FURTHER ORDERED, AS READ ONTO THE RECORD AT THE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ON APRIL 7. 2011, THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND CERTAIN EVIDENCE THAT WAS ALLEGEDLY NOT TIMELY PRODUCED (ECF NO. 25) IS DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ANITA B. BRODY ON 4/18/2011. 4/18/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES VIA ECF AND U.S. MAIL.(mo, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OPTION CARE, INC., WALGREEN
EASTERN CO., INC., OPTION CARE
AND NOW, this __18th__ day of April 2011, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion in
limine to exclude all evidence relating to Plaintiff’s immigration status and employment records
(ECF No. 20) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as explained in the Memorandum of
this same date (ECF No. 43).
It is FURTHER ORDERED, as read onto the record at the Final Pre-Trial Conference
on April 7, 2011, that Plaintiff’s Motion in limine to exclude expert testimony and certain
evidence that was allegedly not timely produced (ECF No. 25) is DENIED.
s/Anita B. Brody
ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on _________ to:
Copies MAILED on _______ to:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?